SHLOMO PESTCOE  שלמה פּסטקאָ

 ³Home³Bio³Shlomo Sez³Shlomo on MySpace³Sufferin' Succotash³Gillygaloo³    

³Yummie³Musical Styles³Instruments³Features³News³Contact³Links³

³ Banjo Roots: From Africa to the New World ³

³ Banjo Ancestors: The Lutes of West Africa ³

³ The Akonting: A West African Ancestor of the Banjo ³

Please note: This is not a commercial site. I do not sell or appraise instruments.

 

 

 

Calling a Fiddle a Lute: The Hornbostel-Sachs System for the Classification of Musical Instruments
 

Since the dawn of musical culture, the sheer of variety of instruments used to make music has been bewilderingly immense. The incredible diversity of musical instruments found the world over, in terms of differing type, function, size and shape, is, to  say the least, staggering. And when you take into consideration the fact that the name of each and every instrument may vary from place to place, people to people, musician to musician, the study and documentation of musical instruments can be exercises in frustration.

Back in 1914, pioneering Austrian ethnomusicologist Erich M. Von Hornbostel (1877-1935) and German musicologist Curt Sachs (1881-1959) made a stab at addressing this problem by creating a comprehensive system of classification "for all musicologists, ethnologists, and curators of ethnological collections and those of cultural history." Today, the Hornbostel- Sachs system is the standard for organology, the science of musical instruments.

In the introduction to their article Systematik der Musikinstrumente (Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 1914), Hornbostel and Sachs recognized that instruments "are alive and dynamic, indifferent to sharp demarcation and set form, while systems are static and depend upon sharply drawn demarcations and categories."

 "These considerations bring special difficulties to the classifier, though also an attractive challenge: his aim must be to develop and refine his concepts so that they better and better fit the reality of his material, sharpen his perception, and enable him to place a specific case in scheme quickly and securely....

A system of classification has theoretical advantages as well as practical ones. Objects which otherwise appear to be quite unrelated to each other may now become associated, revealing new genetic and cultural links. Herein will always be found the leading test of the validity of the criteria upon which the system is based....

All these considerations have persuaded us to undertake afresh the attempt to classify musical instruments.... We are aware that with increasing knowledge, especially of extra-European forms, new difficulties in the way of a consistent classification will constantly arise. It would thus seem impossible to plan a system today which would not require future development and amendment."

At the time, most scholars and museum curators used the Mahillon classification system, devised in 1881 by leading Belgian acoustician Victor-Charles Mahillon (1841-1924) to catalog the instruments in the collection of the Museum of the Brussels Conservatoire. Mahillon was one of the first organologists to classify instruments according to their fundamental sound-producing elements. His system divided them into four main categories: self-sounders, membrane instruments, string instruments, and wind instruments. However, one of the main limitations of Mahillon's system was that it was predicated on the instruments he knew best-- those of the Western European "modern" orchestra of his day. The system pretty much broke down when it came to the issue of how to classify the myriad folk instruments and non-European instruments in general.   

Hornbostel and Sachs proposed a more flexible modular framework that would allow for "open-ended discussion" and future updating. Picking up where Mahillon left off, they developed a new revolutionary approach utilizing the Dewey Decimal Classification system, which was introduced in 1876 by the American library science innovator Melvil Dewey (1851-1931).

The Hornbostel-Sachs system is divided into the following principal categories:

         1. Idiophones (What Mahillon classified as "self-sounders," instruments which produce sound
             by their bodies vibrating, rather than a membrane, string or column of air.)

             11    struck idiophones
             111  idiophones struck directly (e.g. gongs, xylophones, claves, bells)
             112  idiophones struck indirectly (e.g. rattles)

             12    plucked idiophones (also lamellaphones [Latin, lamella, "thin layer or plate"], linguaphones [lingua, "tongue"] )
             121  in the form of a frame (e.g. jaw harps)
             122  in comb-form (e.g. thumb pianos)

             13    friction idiophones 
             131  friction sticks (e.g. "nail violin")
             132  friction plaques
             133  friction vessels (e.g. musical glasses; Benjamin Franklin's glassichord, also called "armonica")

             14    blown idiophones
             141  blown sticks (e.g. wind chimes)
             142  blown plaques

         2. Membranophones (Instruments which have as their main sounding element a taut membrane, such as the head
             of a drum or the cellophane "skin" on a kazoo.)

             21    struck drums
             211  drums struck directly
             212  rattle drums (e.g. Indian budbudaka, Tibetan damaru)

             22    plucked drums (e.g. Indian gopiyantra)

             23    friction drums
             231  friction drums with stick (e.g. rommelpot)
             232  friction drum with cord
             233  hand friction drum

             24    singing membranes (kazoos)
             241  free kazoos
             242  tube or vessel kazoos

         3. Chordophones (String Instruments)

             31    simple chordophones or zithers
             311  bar zithers
             312  tube zithers
             313  raft zithers
             314  board zithers
             315  trough zither
             316  frame zithers

             32    composite chordophones
             321  lutes (plucked and bowed: e.g. guitars, banjos, fiddles)
             322  harps
             323  harp lutes (e.g. West African kora)

         4. Aerophones (Wind Instruments)

              41    free aerophones
              411  displacement free aerophones
              412  interruptive free aerophones
              413  plosive aerophones

              42    wind instruments proper
              421  edge instruments or flutes
              422  reed pipes
              423  trumpets

Subsequently, mechanical and electrical instrument categories have been added.

-- Shlomo Pestcoe

        

³Home³Bio³Shlomo Sez³Shlomo on MySpace³Sufferin' Succotash³Gillygaloo³    

³Yummie³Musical Styles³Instruments³Features³News³Contact³Links³

³ Banjo Roots: From Africa to the New World ³

³ Banjo Ancestors: The Lutes of West Africa ³

³ The Akonting: A West African Ancestor of the Banjo ³

Please send mail to info@shlomomusic.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2005 Shlomo Pestcoe. All rights reserved.
Last modified: 01/28/08